It can all change in the blink of an eye.
It was at the most fundamental level of Velikovsky’s new perspective threatened modern theoretical frameworks, for he claimed:……Planets now moving on stable orbits many millions of miles from Earth have not always moved on these paths…….The solar system has been unstable within human memory. That means not millions or billions of years ago, but within the past few thousand years……..More than once in recent history, errant planets menaced the Earth………In myths and legends, man preserved a record of spectacular celestial events. The primary powers in the myths are planets……..Hence, we cannot understand the myths by any reference to the way things are today………More specifically, Velikovsky offered a dramatic profile of the planets, based on myth and symbol……..The planet Venus once possessed a comet-like tail, and its orbit brought the planet into confrontation with the Earth……….The planet Mars, the war-god of the ancient world, participated directly in Earth-changing catastrophes and appeared to battle other celestial bodies in the sky………During an epoch remembered as the Golden Age, the planet Saturn once shone as the dominant light in the sky when the Earth was possibly a satellite of Saturn.
At just under 1300 feet below sea level, it is the lowest place on earth, the dead sea. ‘How is that possible, if the earth is round?’ For more great ‘Flat Earth info?’ Click here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFo7L…
or here, (and tell him I sent ya). https://www.youtube.com/user/markksar… An email I received stated this may be the type of camera they’ve been using to take pictures of flat planets to make them look spherical. What do you think? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWTMN… Just ‘why would people think the world is flat, and not believe NASA? Click here to find out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYdYy… Time and time again through test, trial, and experiment, it has been shown that the earth is not a whirling globe of popular credulity, but an extended plane of times immaterial. All for `just`a neater equation and to help our young minds grasp math ‘easier,’ some say. http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/cms/ Round earth is ‘also a theory.’ For a part 2, click here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNHoo… So? Just what do we have here? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_… ………..Is everything you know wrong? Hmmm. After all, just what is real when future, unknown, technologies are being used on an unknowing populace that forever appear to be magical in a world full of illusions? Consider me ‘just the lawyer presenting the evidence to you. And you? You be the judge. Is the Antarctic ‘actually off limits’ to all of us common folk? What’s being protected within that 300 mile tropical land mass (or under that freezing ice, below, in those freezing waters), or being held at bay? Imagine, if you will, for a moment, if we lived within a tiny boxed in area that was surrounded by hundreds of miles of impassable ice to which on the other side resided the most largest alien masters / owners / reptilians / Annunaki, that one could think of? You be the judge, remember?
Excerpt from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_Earth The flat Earth model is an archaic conception of the Earth’s shape as a plane or disk. Many ancient cultures subscribed to a flat Earth cosmography, including Greece until the classical period, the Bronze Age and Iron Age civilizations of the Near East until the Hellenistic period, India until the Gupta period (early centuries AD) and China until the 17th century. That paradigm was also typically held in the aboriginal cultures of the Americas, and the notion of a flat Earth domed by the firmament in the shape of an inverted bowl is common in pre-scientific societies.
The idea of a spherical Earth appeared in Greek philosophy with Pythagoras (6th century BC), although most Pre-Socratics retained the flat Earth model. Aristotle accepted the spherical shape of the Earth on empirical grounds around 330 BC, and knowledge of the spherical Earth gradually began to spread beyond the Hellenistic world from then on.
Since the 20th century the consensus among historians of science has been that medieval Europeans, with rare exception, put little confidence in a flat earth model. (end of excerpt).
Notice the last part, ‘ Since the 20th century the consensus among historians of science has been that medieval Europeans, with rare exception, put little confidence in a flat earth model.’ ”Little confidence?” A little. which would mean what? They’re ‘still’ not sure.
I created this video with the YouTube Video Editor (http://www.youtube.com/editor)